Tag: Impact Investing

Putting our Feminism into our Finances

By Kristin Hull, Founder and CEO, Nia Impact Capital

While many of us have been at this for a while now, 2018 is the year we stand to make significant progress in our efforts to bring more women into the financial fold. The #MeToo movement has brought attention to women’s equality everywhere from the red carpet in Hollywood to the executive suite and the board room on Wall Street. The more recent Oscar’s hashtag #HereWeAre is also serving to raise awareness of the importance of women’s voices being included and heard.

With national demonstrations of support including the Women’s March, and myriad celebrations of Women’s History Month as well as a growing body of research highlighting the business case for diverse leadership, those of us looking to change the face of finance have some strong winds in our sails.

From wealth advisors and fund managers, to start up entrepreneurs, to company leadership at the board and executive levels, intuitively we have long known the need for greater diversity within the financial industry. The research is now stacking up pointing to the many and varied benefits for companies, and their investors, that embrace inclusivity. With findings that diverse teams are more innovative (leading to increased revenue generation) and that companies with women in leadership perform better during times of financial uncertainty, we are well on our way to making a strong financial case for inclusion. Additionally, many large firms are recognizing the gender pay gap and that it is in their best interest to close the gap. The news of these efforts strengthens the movement for equality.

This past year has seen record numbers of women (and men alike) gathering to march in the streets to protest the White House, gun violence and use of fossil fuels as well as to speak out for fair treatment of women around the globe. May this also be the year we use our finances as a lever for social change in support of feminist values.

Now is the time to invest with a gender lens. From our consumer activity to our investment portfolio, it is time to align our assets with our goals for gender equity. Each one of our dollars has an impact in the world, from our banking decisions, to our bond and public equity holdings. Let us continue to put our feminism into our finances to ensure that our money is having the impact we are hoping to see in the world.

What does it mean to invest with feminist values?

Here are a few ways to ensure we are leveraging and aligning our portfolios with a gender lens:

• Do all of your companies include women in leadership? There is need for greater diversity at the board and executive leadership in all sizes of companies. Up until recently the onus has been on women to prove that inclusion is a good business proposition. Nowadays, instead of seeing women as a risk factor, the tide is turning toward viewing inclusion as a competitive advantage. Moving forward in this age of inclusion, I believe the burden will move toward men to justify an all-male leadership team. In the meantime, we can send a strong message by voting with our dollars. At Nia, we select only those companies that include women in leadership. We also use our platform and our investor voice to share the accumulating research on women in corporate leadership, encouraging some of our companies to increase their gender diversity numbers.[1]

• Are your investments providing women access to capital? Financial inclusion is a significant part of how we will achieve gender equity. Currently, women receive only 4 percent of venture capital funding. As investors, we all need to check our biases to ensure we are directing capital to women, and not missing opportunities by inadvertently excluding this half of our population of startup businesses. Is your bank providing loans to women entrepreneurs? Are the lending companies in your portfolio on board to lend to women and women owned businesses? Have you checked out Investibule?[2] This new investment platform highlights crowd funding investment opportunities for women entrepreneurs.

• Are the companies in your portfolio producing products and services beneficial to women and girls? It is said that companies with women in charge hire more women. This is a good thing. While leadership opportunities are essential for both a company’s financial bottom line as well as broader inclusion goals, as investors and advisors, it is also important to select companies that have women in mind. To transition to the next, just, sustainable and inclusive economy, those companies that are actively innovating on behalf of women and girls need our investment. From avoiding harmful companies to investing in solutions-focused companies such as those addressing renewable energy, affordable housing and health care solutions, we can use our investment portfolio to invest in a world that works for everyone.

• When evaluating companies in which to invest, company employment policies matter. Are you investing in companies with generous family leave, making it easier for women to excel at their career while also raising a family? Do the companies in your portfolio have diversity goals, as well as policies and practices in place to help them achieve their missions?

• When selecting wealth management services and investment funds, are you choosing female investment advisors and portfolio managers? To change the face of finance moving forward, we will want to bring a gender lens to all levels of our investment decisions. The good news: female managers have been shown to outperform their male counterparts.

• Are you using your investor voice for shareholder engagement? At Nia we view proxy voting as both a shareholder right and a responsibility. From women in board leadership, to CEO pay, to workplace equity we can all use our investor voice by voting proxy statements in alignment with fair and equitable corporate policies and procedures. If your portfolio managers or financial advisors do not already offer this service, As You Sow can help out.[3]

By bringing a gender lens to the investment process, women and men alike can use their assets to bring about more balance and work toward equality while also reaping the potential benefits of financial returns associated with inclusion.

With the cultural and political winds blowing in our favor, let us continue to put our feminism into our finances by incorporating a gender lens at all levels of the investment process.

 

Article by Kristin Hull, founder and CEO of Nia Impact Capital (www.niaimpactcapital.com), a women-led Registered Investment Advisor leading the charge to change the face of finance by hiring and training women and people of color in sustainable and transformative investing. Kristin founded Nia Global Solutions, a gender-lens portfolio of solutions-focused companies, in her efforts to bring impact investing into the public markets.

An impact Investor since 2007, Kristin oversaw the investment process for one of the first family foundations as they moved their endowment assets into 100% alignment with their philanthropic mission. In 2010 Kristin went on to found Nia Community, a 100% mission-aligned impact investment fund focused on social change and environmental sustainability in her home town of Oakland, California.

Kristin is also a co-founder of Impact Hub Oakland and of the North Oakland Community Charter School, and served on the founding board of George Mark Children’s House. Prior to devoting her career to transforming our financial system, Kristin was a full-time educator, teaching bilingual classes in Oakland and San Francisco. She earned her PhD in Education at University of California, Berkeley, her Masters in Research in Bilingual Education from Stanford University and her BA and teaching credentials from Tufts University.

Article Notes:

[1] https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/e1cff9_6a8e1df3745846f28b72d91f8301df3a.pdf
[2] https://investibule.co
[3] https://www.asyousow.org

Energy & Climate, Featured Articles, Impact Investing, Sustainable Business

Women, Politics and Climate Top Shareholder Issues for Proxy Season 2018


Corporate Annual Meetings will Reflect Opioid Crisis, Gun Laws, Board Diversity and more

Proxy Preview 2018, released in March by As You Sow, the Sustainable Investments Institute (Si2), and Proxy Impact, offers a comprehensive look at more than 400 shareholder resolutions filed on environmental, social and sustainable governance (ESG) issues. The report shows how investors continue to seek accountability on climate change risk and corporate political spending, but have growing concerns regarding the treatment of women. Other key issues include gun laws, the opioid crisis, fake news and human trafficking.

Investors and companies are proactively discussing disclosure and reporting to shareholders even as Congress pushes for more deregulation and less corporate transparency. Early investor votes already suggest investors will continue strong support evinced last year, but action at the Securities and Exchange Commission is raising some red flags.

Download the Report here – www.proxypreview.org

Key report findings include:

• The report covers the 330 shareholder resolutions now pending for votes, alongside at least 30 blocked from consideration by company challenges at the SEC and 62 withdrawn by proponents, often after company accords that continue apace.

• 80 resolutions ask companies to disclose political activity spending and 80 more ask companies to address climate change risks and explain more about how they will adapt to a carbon-constrained world. Companies face pressure given the legacy of 2017 majority votes on climate risk at ExxonMobil and Occidental Petroleum.

• Demands for equal treatment for women are reflected in 70 resolutions about fair treatment and fair pay at work, in addition to three dozen more seeking boards that are more gender diverse.

• More than 50 resolutions focus on board oversight, sustainability reporting and linking ESG issues to executive compensation.

Heidi Welsh, executive director, Si2 and co-author of Proxy Preview 2018, said, “The chasm between growing investor disclosure expectations and shrinking environmental protections emerging from Washington is widening, but companies answer to their investors, not politicians. While market moving mutual funds like Blackrock and Vanguard want companies to tell more, the SEC seems to be tightening up its rules for what investors can consider.”

“This should be a pivotal year for shareholders,” said Michael Passoff, CEO of Proxy Impact and co-author of Proxy Preview 2018. “Shareholders are looking to build on last year’s unprecedented support from some of the world’s largest mutual funds, while simultaneously fighting off governmental efforts to suppress shareholder rights.”

“As government protections for our environment have been systematically eliminated and the social safety net shredded, we are seeing new and established investor coalitions step into the breach and raise the stakes for companies and their boards to grapple with these materials issues that affect all of our futures,” said Andrew Behar, CEO of As You Sow. “Proxy Preview highlights these investor voices that our government wants to silence.”

 

As You Sow is a nonprofit organization that promotes environmental and social corporate responsibility through shareholder advocacy, coalition building, and innovative legal strategies. www.asyousow.org

Proxy Impact provides shareholder engagement and proxy voting services that promote sustainable and responsible business practices. www.proxyimpact.com

The Sustainable Investments Institute (Si2) provides impartial analysis to help institutions make informed, independent choices on social and environmental shareholder proposals. www.siinstitute.org

Contact:
Cyrus Nemati (510) 735-8157 or- cnemati@asyousow.org

Additional Articles, Energy & Climate, Impact Investing, Sustainable Business

Sonya Dreizler, CFP Interviews Gloria Nelund, CEO, TriLinc Global

Impact Investing Success Story: Lending in Developing Countries – Improving Lives and Livelihoods While Generating Market Rate Returns

Recently, I got to visit a long time friend and mentor of mine, Gloria Nelund, Chairman & CEO of TriLinc Global. Gloria is a leader and innovator in the impact investing space so I was thrilled to talk to her about the impact investing “a-ha” moment she had partway through her career as well as the details of a recent international lending success she’s particularly proud of.

 

Sonya: How long have you been working in impact investing and community lending?

Gloria: As a full time career endeavor it has only been since 2008 when I started TriLinc; however, I have always been a believer in it – even before it had a label. Growing up in Ohio with a father who was a business owner, it just made sense to me that you would make better returns if you invested in “good companies” with quality management teams and ethical business practices, and who gave back to their communities. So, in the late 90s when I had the opportunity to support the development of a socially-responsible investment (SRI) product at Scudder, I was excited. It wasn’t that easy though – as you know, it really hasn’t been until the past few years that you could easily get the information needed to make that analysis.

Then, when I was at Deutsche Bank, a leading institutional supporter of microcredit, I led the effort to create multiple programs to help Private Wealth Management clients learn about and invest in the sector. I also served on the Board of the Deutsche Bank Americas Community Development Group, which provided loans, investments and grants to targeted organizations throughout the U.S. and Latin America.

Sonya: So in your current role, which is 100% impact investing focused, can you tell me about a meaningful impact project that you have worked on?

Gloria: Wow. It’s difficult to pick only one.

There is one of TriLinc’s loans though that I do love – it’s a loan to a grain processor in Uganda. The owners started the company because they felt a personal responsibility to help the people of Uganda. They operate their business with an ethical and moral compass that leads them to employ business practices that allow them to run a profitable business, while at the same time, advancing the economy in the region, and significantly improving the lives of smallholder farmers and their families.

This grain processor company sources, processes, and stores maize before selling it all across Uganda, Kenya, and Rwanda to clients such as the relief organization, World Food Programme. The company sources 80% of their maize from local farmers, thereby reducing the carbon footprint of the production process. Additionally, the company provides the local, supplying farmers support centers where they can sell their maize, access competitively priced agricultural inputs such as seeds and fertilizers, and borrow working capital at reasonable rates. To date, these support centers have provided over 45,000 farmers with agricultural finance. All of these activities facilitate the farmers’ ability to sell their harvests through a reliable process at fair pricing. This improves farmers’ livelihoods and contributes to regional food security. The resulting increased stability of harvests creates regular and more predictable income to both the farmers and the grain processor.

Sonya: That’s great. What about on the risk side of the equation?

Gloria: Occupational health and safety risks can significantly hurt the financial performance of a company – accidents, spills, employee strikes, etc. are costly to a company. To that end, this grain processor sought to meet the standards of, and was approved by, the National Environment Management Authority for its “sustainable business practices.” They know that by paying fair wages, understanding and managing the environmental impact of their business, and by ensuring compliance with national environmental and social standards around waste management, occupational health and safety, and community concerns, the company avoids these costly operational risks and enhances their own profitability.

Sonya: Tell me more about how you see risk management in relation to impact investing and the direct lending work you do.

Gloria: Purely from a risk management perspective, understanding a company’s environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices can help reduce the risk of the investment. There are many great examples, but Nike is probably the one that got the most press. In 1991 when it was discovered that they were exploiting workers in their Asian manufacturing operations, their stock suffered almost overnight and sales dropped dramatically. That is an example of a social risk that could have been known if there had been analysis of the company’s practices and policies. In our analysis at TriLinc, in addition to evaluating standard ESG factors, we also look for companies with strong management teams and ethical business practices because we believe they just make better investments.

Loan structuring is where we have an advantage over more developed markets where there is not as much of a supply-demand mismatch. We make loans to private companies in emerging markets where there is a significant lending gap and so, as the lender, we have an advantage. We could use that advantage to simply “extract” more return (which we do not do) instead we use that advantage to reduce the risk of the investment by the requirements, terms and covenants. For example, we over-collateralize our loans with hard assets that have been discounted to liquidation value.

Sonya: What are your thoughts on your company’s role in contributing to positive social and environmental impact?

Gloria: To solve the big challenges the world faces, we need private capital, at scale, focused on investing in sustainable, responsible companies committed to making a positive impact.

Bringing an institutional quality investment opportunity that allows investors to get both market rate returns and proof of positive impact has allowed us to bring more private capital to projects and companies that create impact. It’s a win-win!

Sonya: What interesting project are you working on now?

Gloria: In addition to launching a new fund for institutional investors, the TriLinc Global Sustainable Income Fund, we are also launching a new event series called RIA Impact Roundtable with the purpose of gathering like-minded impact investors and money managers to identify ways that we can collectively advance the impact investing industry.

 

For more information on TriLinc Global – https://www.trilincglobal.com

For more on Sonya and Solutions with Sonya – www.solutionswithsonya.com

Additional Articles, Impact Investing, Sustainable Business

ImpactAssets Releases IA 50 Impact Investment Fund Showcase

Industry’s only free, searchable resource of impact investing fund managers features firms that manage $29.2 billion in assets.

ImpactAssets has released its 2017-18 ImpactAssets 50 (IA 50), a free, online database for investors and financial advisors that features a diversified listing of 50 private capital fund managers that deliver social and environmental impact as well as financial returns. IA 50 users can sort and filter across a range of asset classes (debt, private equity and real estate), geographies, size of funds, themes and more. Find the database here.

“As impact investing grows exponentially, the IA 50 has remained a leading and trusted resource for impact investors of all experience levels,” said Jed Emerson, ImpactAssets Senior Fellow, and IA 50 Review Committee Chair. “Our consistent and objective evaluation of impact fund managers is providing financial advisors and their clients with a starting place to make informed investment decisions. And we are helping to catalyze the growth of impact investing by creating a centralized information source in a fragmented field.”

Fund managers included in the seventh annual IA 50 manage an estimated $29.2 billion in assets devoted to creating measurable, positive impact – nearly double the assets managed by IA 50 managers in the previous year.

This year’s showcase includes:

• Larger Funds: Six funds have more than $1 billion in assets under management.

• Deep Experience: A total of 32 out of 50 fund managers have been operating for more than 10 years.

• Diverse Management: Nearly half (48%) of all IA 50 funds have investment management teams with 50% or more women and other under-represented groups.

“The 2017-18 IA 50 highlights a strong field of managers across an increasingly rich marketplace of impact fund opportunities,” said Jennifer Kenning, CEO and Co-Founder of Align Impact, and IA 50 Senior Investment Advisor. “We are excited to see the growth of this space as evidenced by the increasing number of high-caliber fund managers, whose strong financial and impact track records position them to serve the growing investor demand for impact investments.”

In addition to Emerson and Kenning, the IA 50 Review Committee includes impact investment pioneers and leaders, including Karl “Charly” Kleissner, Co-Founder of Toniic and KL Felicitas Foundation; Kathy Leonard, Senior Vice President, Investments and Senior Portfolio Manager for UBS; Stephanie Cohn Rupp, Managing Director, and Partner, Tiedemann Wealth Management; Fran Seegull, Executive Director, U.S. Impact Investing Alliance, Ford Foundation; Liesel Pritzker Simmons and Ian Simmons, Co-Founders of Blue Haven Initiative; Matthew Weatherley-White, Co-Founder and Managing Director of The CAPROCK Group.

“The IA 50 has become the go-to database for insights and actionable data on innovative managers creating impact with investment capital, which is especially valuable for family offices and accredited investors getting started in the impact space,” said Stephanie Cohn Rupp, Managing Director, and Partner at Tiedemann Wealth Management. “We’re thrilled to be helping investors connect their portfolios with their passions and drive capital to impact.”

The IA 50 is not an index or investable platform and does not constitute an offering or recommend specific products. It is not a replacement for due diligence. In order to be considered for the IA 50 2017-18, fund managers needed to have at least $10 million in assets under management, more than 3 years of experience as a firm with impact investing, documented social and/or environmental impact and be available for U.S. investment. Additional details on the selection process are here.

 

About ImpactAssets
ImpactAssets (www.impactassets.org) is a nonprofit financial services firm that increases the flow of capital into investments delivering financial, social and environmental returns. ImpactAssets’ donor advised fund (“The Giving Fund”) and field-building initiatives enable philanthropists, other asset owners and their wealth advisors to advance social or environmental change through investment. The Giving Fund currently has $424M in total assets.

About the ImpactAssets 50
The IA 50 is the first publicly available database that provides a gateway into the world of impact investing for investors and their financial advisors, offering an easy way to identify experienced impact investment firms and explore the landscape of potential investment options. The IA 50 is intended to illustrate the breadth of impact investment fund managers operating today, though it is not a comprehensive list. These 50 firms have been selected to demonstrate a wide range of impact investing activities across geographies, sectors and asset classes.

Contact:
Amy Bennett Director, Marketing
Phone (415) 370-4899 / email- abennett@impactassets.org

 

Additional Articles, Energy & Climate, Food & Farming, Impact Investing, Sustainable Business

Top 10 Stakeholder Engagement Trends of 2018 – New Report from Future 500

Latest report reveals how global businesses can—and must—take the lead on environmental and social issues because the future of sustainability is now in the hands of worldwide brands, their consumers, and the NGOs holding them accountable.

Global stakeholder engagement nonprofit Future 500 explores the evolving risks + opportunities of corporate stewardship in its latest report, Top 10 Stakeholder Engagement Trends of 2018. The report identifies 10 key drivers shaping modern business—including fleet electrification, marine plastic pollution, environmental justice, and predictions for the looming clash between regulators and Big Tech. Each trend comes with suggested actions for corporations to respond to threats and position themselves as industry leaders.

“At the core of our mission is to cultivate the future leaders of sustainable business,” said Future 500 CEO Bill Shireman. “2018 is particularly interesting for us. It’s a make-or-break year for corporate stewardship. Brands can be assured that their stakeholders will hold them to account on any and all commitments to leadership.”

This is the seventh report in Future 500’s annual Stakeholder Engagement Trends series. Each year, the nonprofit compiles a broad set of industry data along with firsthand feedback from its network of CEOs, activist leaders, investment experts and major funders. With a unique birdseye industry view, the team ties together environmental, economic, and social trends to make keen predictions for the coming year and beyond.

In 2017, Future 500 saw growing global unity around ocean pollution, just transition and freshwater conservation, while greater engagement on the local and state level empowered social justice groups and vocal brand advocacy. Many of these predictions proved accurate as leaders emerged to fill the political stewardship vacuum—held accountable by increasingly sophisticated stakeholder campaigns.

This year’s report continues along this trajectory to its real-world outcomes, exploring advancements in renewable energy, data technology and campaign tactics in an evolving stakeholder landscape.

Shireman expressed optimism for a global community moving forward on COP21 and Sustainable Development Goals. “If we can take something away from our political gridlock, it’s that there is much more to unite us than divide on sustainability issues.”

“The challenge, and the key measure for success in the coming year, is how we convert this knowledge into lasting, real-world impact.”

The report’s top insights include:

• Corporations modernize with all-electric fleets _implications for sustainable business, as well as the impact on utilities + traditional fuel producers

• NGOs and advocacy groups are forming an unlikely alliance with major investors like Blackrock, becoming the new corporate regulators

• Environmental justice goes mainstream, putting stricter micro level demands on corporate sustainability.

• Global standards from COP21 and the UN s Sustainable Development Goals are internalized on state, local and corporate levels now, — these groups must measure real world operations against these goals.

The report is available to download here – http://www.future500.org/TopTen2018/

 

About Future 500
Future 500 is a global nonprofit facilitating cross-sector stakeholder engagement—a collaborative process for corporations, investors and advocates to achieve systemic environmental solutions. Since 1995, Future 500 is dedicated to uniting diverse stakeholders around building a sustainable future. We believe true change is the result of removing institutional barriers, fostering innovative ideas, and establishing common ground between uncommon allies. 

Contact:
Mary Ann McDonnell, Future 500 – mmcdonnell@future500.org

 

Additional Articles, Energy & Climate, Food & Farming, Impact Investing, Sustainable Business

Pax World Funds Persuades Finance and Tech Companies to Close Gender Pay Gap

Sustainable Investment Firm Withdraws Pay Equity Shareholder Resolutions at Discover, HP and KeyCorp

Pax World Funds (Pax), a pioneer in sustainable investing advised by Impax Asset Management LLC, has successfully withdrawn pay equity shareholder resolutions at three companies in the financial services and technology sectors following their commitments to take proactive steps toward enhancing pay equity disclosure and to close unexplained pay gaps. Pax targeted companies in financial services and technology because these industries have among the highest gender pay gaps,[1] have struggled to attract, retain and promote female employees and are where women are more likely to leave at midcareer.[2]

In late 2017, Pax (https://paxworld.com) filed shareholder proposals at Discover Financial Services (Discover), HP, Inc (HP) and KeyCorp requesting that the companies identify whether a gender pay gap exists among their employees, and if so, outline steps being taken to reduce the gap. At the time of the filings, none of the companies had any public disclosure related to pay equity. Pax withdrew its proposals when the companies agreed to publish commitments to pay equity, alongside detailed information on their processes for managing pay equity. In addition, KeyCorp has published the results of its most recent pay analysis on its website.

The level of disclosure that will be provided by Discover, HP and KeyCorp, and their commitments to remediate unexplained pay gaps is significant, given that less than half of tech companies and just over a quarter of financial services companies make pay equity adjustments as part of their annual compensation review process.[3]

“This pay equity disclosure is more robust than what we have seen in the past and is a major step forward in the fight to close the pay gap,” said Heather Smith, Lead Sustainability Research Analyst, Impax Asset Management LLC/Pax World Funds. “We believe that companies that make clear commitments to achieving pay equity, like Discover, HP and KeyCorp, will be better positioned to attract and retain talented employees and achieve greater gender diversity.”

Since 2015, Pax has filed or co-filed fourteen shareholder resolutions on pay equity. So far, twelve companies have enhanced their pay equity disclosure, including Apple, eBay and Amazon. Pax has also written to 32 technology companies and 39 financial companies held across its mutual funds asking for information about how the companies are addressing pay equity and that they publicly disclose the results of a company pay analysis. And in February 2016, Pax Ellevate Management, a joint venture of Impax Asset Management LLC and Ellevate Asset Management, sent a petition for rulemaking to the SEC urging the agency to require public companies to disclose gender pay ratios on an annual basis.

“As investors, our goal is to understand how companies are managing pay equity and if they are taking the appropriate steps to reduce regulatory, reputational and litigation risks associated with pay inequities,” said Smith. “Companies that are successful in closing pay gaps and are transparent about their efforts will be well-positioned to make meaningful progress in narrowing the gender gaps in their talent pipelines, and by extension, the overall gender gap in the workforce.”

Additionally, Pax World Funds and Mercy Investment Services recently announced the results of a successful shareholder engagement with US Foods to improve its board diversity policies and take steps to diversify its board of directors. You can read more in the press release here.

 

About Pax World Funds

Pax World Funds (“Pax”) are advised by Impax Asset Management LLC, formerly Pax World Management LLC, a pioneer in the field of sustainable investing. Pax offers a diverse lineup of mutual funds focused on the risks and opportunities arising from the transition to a more sustainable global economy. Each fund integrates environmental, social and governance (ESG) research into the investment process to better manage risk and deliver competitive long-term investment performance. Since 1971, Pax has made it possible for investors to pursue financial returns while having a positive social and environmental impact.

You should consider a fund’s investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing. For this and other information, call 800.767.1729 or visit www.paxworld.com for a fund prospectus and read it carefully before investing.

Pax World Funds are distributed by ALPS Distributors, Inc. Member FINRA.

ALPS Distributors, Inc. is not affiliated with Mercy Investment Services.

Impax Asset Management LLC, formerly Pax World Management LLC, is investment adviser to Pax World Funds and a pioneer in the field of sustainable investing. We offer a diverse lineup of mutual funds and separate accounts focused on the risks and opportunities associated with the transition to a more sustainable global economy.

 

Article Notes:
[1] Dr. Andrew Chamberlain, “Demystifying the Gender Pay Gap,” Glassdoor, 2016.
[2] Mercer, “When Women Thrive: Financial Services Perspective,” 2016;
[3] Mercer, “When Women Thrive: Financial Services Perspective,” 2016; and Mercer, When Women Thrive, Technology Industry Perspective,” 2017.

Contact:
Heather Smith, Impax Asset Management LLC / Pax World Funds
Lead Sustainability Research Analyst & Portfolio Manager
Phone (603) 501-7351 or email – h.smith@impaxam.com

Additional Articles, Impact Investing, Sustainable Business

Investment Decisions That Impact Your Career

By Bonnie Foley-Wong, Founder, Pique Ventures

There are many paths to a career in impact investing. Some impact fund managers began their careers in traditional venture capital[1], whilst other investors have found success previously as entrepreneurs[2].

I am an impact investor and I’m an entrepreneur in the impact investing industry. I found my way here after beginning my career as a Chartered Accountant (now Chartered Professional Accountant) after decades of working closely with, advising, and financing entrepreneurs. A defining phase of my career was a 10-year period in London, when I was as a corporate finance advisor and investment banker. During this time, I refined my due diligence skills and gained the critical and foundational experience of understanding how capital moved in private and public markets. Most importantly, I experienced how people made investment decisions – individually and in committees – and I began to influence capital decisions directly.

My career reached a critical point 8 years ago when I myself started to adopt an entrepreneurial mindset and sought to answer three critical questions:

• How can we move money in a more purposeful way?
• Where are all the women investors?
• What does it mean to be an entrepreneur in the investment industry?

For me, the answer to all three questions was Pique Ventures, an impact investment and management company that I founded in 2012.

After trialling different models for Pique Ventures (such as something resembling a boutique corporate finance advisory firm and an investor network), my early adopter investors wanted a fund. I realized that an impact venture fund was a way to move money more purposefully and with intentional design, and it could attract more women investors to the space. Even though some start-up founders didn’t consider me a founder, I soon discovered for myself that a new venture fund is a start-up business just like any other new business – a start-up with a very particular business model of aggregating and deploying capital.

Through Pique Ventures, I started out advising organizations on developing new venture funds, while in parallel planning my first fund. A turning point came in 2014, when I launched the Pique Fund, an inclusive angel fund focused on leadership diversity. It was the first step to Pique Ventures, evolving from a consulting firm to an impact fund manager. After managing Pique Fund for three years, still working closely with entrepreneurs, and even being a hands-on operator within another business that I manage under Pique Ventures, I finally embraced the entrepreneur in me. I enjoy finding investment product-investor market fit and continually thinking about how our investment thesis and strategy needs to evolve with our economy and society.

Someone asked me recently if they should focus on making a lot of money early in their career and then do something impact-focused later. That is essentially an investment decision about how to spend your time and resources along your career path. Every person’s path is different, but from my experience, earning enough to have your own seed capital is helpful – particularly for being an entrepreneur in the investment industry and starting a new venture fund. I seeded Pique Fund with my own capital. It wasn’t a lot, but it was necessary because investors wanted to see that I was putting my own money where my mouth is. What I lacked in capital, I made up for in terms of expertise and network.

My career choices were almost always guided by curiosity about the unknown and a passion to observe and understand how people make decisions, which is what led me to investment banking. Although I learned that investment banking was not my final destination, it was a great way for me to gain the financing expertise I needed to later launch an impact venture fund. The fascination with decision-making continues to this day, defines much of my work, and is core to who I am as an investor, entrepreneur, and author. I went on to document an impact investing decision-making methodology called Integrated Investing[3], and published it as a book in 2016.

I recall being thrown into networking situations very early in my career, starting with wine and cheese events during the recruitment season for accounting co-op students at the University of Waterloo in Canada. But it wasn’t until I started building my own businesses and taking a more entrepreneurial path that I realized the importance of making connections and building relationships, and how to do it well, authentically, and in a fun way. Private venture investment is a capital network, not a capital market – at least not yet a market – and therefore personal and professional relationships are critical for moving capital in a purposeful way.

In addition to curiosity and passion, like any entrepreneur, I also needed creativity to fuel the solutions to design, develop, and execute on a new venture fund and the persistence to follow-through on my vision. There were many people that doubted me along the way. A mere 15 months before Pique Fund launched, I thought about giving up on the idea of a new venture fund having received more negative feedback than positive. As I noted earlier, I was also in the middle of writing Integrated Investing, an impact investing decision-making methodology. I shared some of concepts from Integrated Investing with a small group of change-makers at a dialogue in New York focused on systems change. There, I met a senior executive from a large asset management firm who told me I was on to something. He was particularly enamored by a concept I developed called Access to Essential Resources[4]. It took prime spot as the first chapter of the Integrated Investing book (an alternative title for the chapter would be, “What Start-ups Do We Still Need?”[5])

Only a few days after the dialogue in New York, I was in Toronto and had my first conversation with Lally Rementilla, who would go on to be the first external investor in Pique Fund and join Pique Fund’s Board. It was not only the beginning of a wonderful working relationship of making investment decisions together; it was the vote of confidence that catalyzed the launch of Pique Fund. Finding a lead investor helped give five other pioneering women the confidence to invest in Pique Fund when it was merely an idea.

Leaders and pioneers helped me create a place where investors – new and experienced, of moderate and high levels of wealth, particularly women – could gather and invest in a way that took care of the village. Pique Fund now has 39 investors, of which 31 are women, representing 80 percent of the fund’s capital. We have so far invested in seven impactful women-led technology ventures, themselves quite diverse, employing 42 percent women and 36 percent people of color. 40 percent of our portfolio companies’ management teams are women and 30 percent are people of color. In Canada, Pique Ventures is one of only two fund managers with a gender lens and Pique Fund is one of only two gender lens investors as identified in Wharton Social Impact Initiative’s Project Sage[6]. Pique Ventures and Pique Fund are the longest-standing fund manager and fund, respectively, in Canada investing with a gender lens.

In summary, a sense of purpose, curiosity, and the persistence to pursue purposeful aims are the key motivators for a career in impact investing. Whilst capital can certainly accelerate or make easier that pursuit, expertise and network are critical ingredients for success.

There’s a reason I named my business Pique. I endeavor to pique people’s curiosity about the unknown and pique their interest about impact investing. Pique is a diverse community of investors and together we are investing to take care of the village and help create a better world.

 

Article by Bonnie Foley-Wong, founder of Pique Ventures (http://piqueventures.com) and founding investor in Pique Fund . She is also the author of Integrated Investing: Impact Investing with Head, Heart, Body, and Soul (http://piqueventures.com/book). Bonnie helps a diverse community of leaders pursue integrated investing. With over 20 years experience of mobilizing capital for entrepreneurial businesses as a financier, investor, and entrepreneur, Bonnie has financed over $1 billion dollars of alternative investments in Europe and North America.

Bonnie is a CPA (Ontario), CA, and CFA charter holder. She has a Bachelor of Mathematics and Master of Accounting from the University of Waterloo.

Article Notes:
[1] http://www.dblpartners.vc/people/nancy-pfund
[2] http://www.catalystatlarge.com/about
[3] http://integratedinvesting.ca
[4] http://piqueventures.com/impact-introduction-to-access-to-essential-resources
[5] http://piqueventures.com/what-startups-do-we-still-need-2
[6] https://socialimpact.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/ProjectSageReport_10.25.17.pdf

Additional Articles, Impact Investing, Sustainable Business

Gender Equality: With or Without the Federal Government

By Julie Gorte, SVP, Impax Asset Mgmt/Pax World Funds

“The reputation of a thousand years may be determined by the conduct of one hour.” – Japanese Proverb

There was a time in human history when size and strength were defining characteristics of a person’s value and of the jobs on which the clan’s survival depended. Today, that is largely no longer the case, but cultural patterns that developed over hundreds of thousands of years are not easily undone. Gender-based inequalities in pay, prestige and power persist, and undoing the bias at the heart of them can’t be done with the stroke of a pen.

If it were, we might not have a pay gap now. The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act was signed into law in 2009, strengthening civil rights laws aimed at non-discrimination in hiring and pay. But since the current administration took office, there has been a significant rollback in regulations and laws that were helpful in ending gender-based discrimination. The Center for American Progress catalogued 100 actions that it said were harmful to women and families in the first 100 days of the Trump administration.[1] The current Cabinet is about 18.8 percent female, compared with the U.S.’s 21.7 percent women/men ratio[2] in boards among large companies, and less gender-diverse than the past five cabinets.[3] Would we expect progress in diversity from such a group? Possibly, but it’s not likely. An article in Foreign Policy magazine put it this way: “A leadership cadre with fewer women (not to mention socially conservative men) is less likely to approve legislation or implement policies that support and empower women at home or abroad, and a society in which women are discriminated against is less likely to promote women to positions of power.”[4] But for those of us who believe in gender equality, despair is not warranted.

Policy, especially federal policy, is a powerful tool for shaping behavior. Luckily, it’s not the only one. We have often looked to federal policy to curb corporate actions that resulted in harm, but we sometimes forget that corporate action can be a powerful antidote to policy feebleness. There is ample evidence that corporations—even if they wanted to—probably aren’t thinking, “oh, good, now we can keep saving money by paying women less.” Why? Reputation is a powerful thing, and a corporation that depends on women at any level—as employees, stockholders, customers, investors—is understandably wary about alienating half of any of those stakeholder groups.

Reputation is even more of a powerful tool now than it was historically. Among the S&P 500, 84 percent of companies’ market value consisted of intangible assets in 2015.[5] What that means, among other things, is that a loss of value inspired by a loss of investor confidence doesn’t have much of a safety net, which we customarily think of as the value of the bricks and mortar assets that make up the company’s value in the case of a fire sale. Wynn Resorts is the latest poster child for that: after allegations of sexual harassment and assault surfaced there, several Wall Street analysts downgraded the company’s rating, and the company’s share price plunged nearly 17 percent over one weekend.[6] We don’t know exactly how much the value of Uber dropped during its own “bro culture” revelations, which in any case were complicated by other reports of significant misconduct, but one article late in 2017 noted that it was worth 30 percent less than it had been two years earlier.[7]

2017 was a remarkable year in many ways, not the least of which was the cultural sea change on the topic of gender harassment. Before last year, sexual harassment was something that rarely made headlines, and most of the time was probably unreported by victims, because the risk of retaliation was significantly greater than the possibility of justice. We’re not done solving the problem, and perhaps we never will be, but we’re also clear on the idea that we can make a lot of progress without getting an assist from Washington DC.

Having open, inclusive cultures in which success is not limited by gender or race or ethnicity is something that all companies need if they want to prosper, and especially if they want to grow. Companies depend on women and men as customers, workers, suppliers, investors, and community members. Alienating half of them is not a recipe for competitive success. Research at Harvard showed that multinational firms were able to achieve competitive advantages over indigenous firms in Korea by aggressively hiring and promoting people from groups that were disadvantaged there—notably, women.[8] Sexist pricing—charging women more than men for essentially identical products—can be embarrassing and costly for companies caught doing it.[9] Companies involved in human trafficking and modern slavery can suffer in terms of brand image and stock price, as well as employee morale.[10]

Investors are more interested in gender than they ever have been before, judging by things like proxy voting and engagement. BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, recently has signaled in its proxy voting guidelines that all-male boards are not acceptable, and noted that boards should have at least two women on them.[11] Pax has been voting like that for years[12], and we know our impact will be multiplied if other investors vote similarly. Another large investor, State Street, reportedly voted against directors of 400 companies whose boards were all-male.[13] Moves like these show that mainstream, as well as sustainable investors, are aware of the research that links women in leadership to superior financial performance, and are prepared to act on that knowledge with proxy votes.[14] There is rich literature showing that more women in leadership positions—senior executives as well as boards—is correlated with financial outperformance, as well as several other characteristics of high-performing companies, such as better accounting, innovation, and more careful board monitoring. I have written a summary of the investment-case literature available on Pax World Funds’ website.[15]

Gender equality is also an economic stimulus. McKinsey reports that the global economy could be $12 trillion to $28 trillion larger by 2025 if gender gaps were reduced (the lower number) or eliminated (the higher one).[16] The International Monetary Fund argues that closing gender gaps improves economic efficiency by raising productivity and improving development outcomes.[17] It should be no surprise that gender equality is linked to both economic progress and financial performance; the surprise would be if that were not the case. OECD notes, “There can be no robust growth economy without gender equality,” and estimates that reducing the gender gap in labor force participation by half would boost GDP by 6 percent by 2030, or 12 percent if the entire gap were eliminated.[18]

These kinds of strong economic and financial drivers give investors reasons to care about gender equality, and to use their tools—investments, proxy voting, and engagement—to achieve it. And none of that has anything to do with policy. Policy can be a head wind or a tail wind, but compared with the economic and financial reasons for advancing gender equality, policy is more of a gentle breeze than a gale, no matter which way the winds blow.

 

Article by Julie Gorte, Ph.D., Senior Vice President for Sustainable Investing, Impax Asset Management LLC/Pax World Funds (www.paxworld.com)

Julie oversees Environmental, Social and Governance-related research on prospective and current investments, as well as the firm’s shareholder advocacy and work on public policy advocacy. Julie is also a member of the Pax World Gender Analytics team and a Portfolio Manager of the Pax Ellevate Global Women’s Index Fund. 

Julie serves on the boards of the Sustainable Investments Institute, the Endangered Species Coalition, E4theFuture and Clean Production Action. She has served as the co-chair of the Asset Management Working Group of the United Nations Environment Programme Finance. 

Prior to joining the firm, Julie served as Vice President and Chief Social Investment Strategist at Calvert. Her experience before she joined the investment world in 1999 includes nearly 14 years as Senior Associate and Project Director at the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment, Vice President for Economic and Environmental Research at The Wilderness Society, Program Manager for Technology Programs in the Environmental Protection Agency’s policy office and Senior Associate at the Northeast-Midwest Institute. She received her Bachelor of Science in Forest Management at Northern Arizona University and a Master of Science and Ph.D from Michigan State in resource economics.

Article Notes:
[1] https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/women/reports/2017/04/25/430969/100-days-100-ways-trump-administration-harming-women-families/
[2] https://www.msci.com/documents/10199/248121/MSCI_Women+of+Board+Infographic.pdf/3138edf7-4ad2-47f6-9db7-d904e41d256e
[3] http://www.refinery29.com/2017/01/132977/trump-cabinet-picks-gender-balance-comparison
[4] http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/04/04/donald-trumps-presidency-is-an-assault-on-women/
[5] http://www.oceantomo.com/intangible-asset-market-value-study/
[6] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/wynn-resorts-stock-price-drops-after-wall-st-downgrade/
[7] https://slate.com/business/2017/12/uber-value-drops-30-percent-since-2015.html
[8] https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/multinational-firms-labor-market-discrimination-and-the-capture-of-competitive-advantage-by-exploiting-the-social-divide
[9] https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/the-end-of-shrink-it-or-pink-it-a-history-of-advertisers-missing-the-mark-with-women/2016/06/08/3bcb1832-28e9-11e6-ae4a-3cdd5fe74204_story.html?utm_term=.e6f0fb5022cd
[10] https://www.forbes.com/sites/bobeccles/2017/07/18/how-companies-can-lead-fight-against-150-billion-human-trafficking-trade/#774a28240b7c
[11] https://www.wsj.com/articles/blackrock-companies-should-have-at-least-two-female-directors-1517598407
[12] https://paxworld.com/spotlight-on-engagement-gender-diversity/
[13] https://www.wsj.com/articles/state-street-votes-against-400-companies-citing-gender-diversity-1501029490
[14] https://paxworld.com/category/research/gender/
[15] https://paxworld.com/the-investment-case-for-gender-equality-new/
[16] https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Global Themes/Employment and Growth/How advancing womens equality can add 12 trillion to global growth/MGI Power of parity_Full report_September 2015.ashx
[17] http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2012/03/revenga.htm
[18] http://www.oecd.org/gender/push-gender-equality-economic-sense.htm

Featured Articles, Impact Investing, Sustainable Business

Barron’s 100 Most Sustainable Companies (with Calvert Research)

Every weekday, instead of a private car, Benno Dorer takes Bay Area Rapid Transit from San Francisco to Clorox’s headquarters in Oakland. The Clorox CEO buys sustainable products, including his company’s Brita water filters, and separates his trash diligently, teaching his children to do the same.

For a company best known for a toxic product—bleach—Clorox has become one of America’s greenest companies, publishing goals on greenhouse gas emissions and energy use, phasing out controversial substances, and adding lines of natural products like Burt’s Bees. “As a CEO, I don’t think I can be credible without walking the walk,” Dorer says. “At the end of the day, the company’s commitment to sustainability starts with the CEO.”

Sustainability is mission-critical to Clorox, which ranks No. 9 in Barron’s first annual list of most sustainable companies. The investing world is increasingly agreeing with Dorer’s public-spirited views, as it redefines its roles as a fiduciary and steward of capital. The issue exploded onto center stage this year, when CEO Larry Fink of BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, told companies in which the firm invests that they need to “not only deliver financial performance, but also show how [they] make a positive contribution to society…benefit[ing] all of their stakeholders, including shareholders, employees, customers, and the communities in which they operate.”

It’s in this spirit that Barron’s offers our first ranking of the most sustainable companies in the U.S. We have always aimed to provide information about what keenly interests investors—and what affects investment risk and performance. The term “sustainability” doesn’t have a single definition, but for years now, European investors have looked at environmental, social, and governance factors—qualitative measures that people believe promote a company’s long-term health and growth prospects. Thus, what began as an expression of values is finding wider currency as good corporate practices. That view has made its way to the U.S., as Fink’s letter makes abundantly clear.

And more U.S. investors are signing the United Nations guidelines that commit to incorporating ESG criteria. Last year, Paul Smith, chief of the CFA Institute, wrote: “Consensus is emerging in many countries that it is asset managers’ fiduciary duty to incorporate ESG factors into their financial analysis, especially when material to a company’s long-term prospects.”

To create our ranking, we turned to a sustainable-investing stalwart: Calvert Research and Management, an arm of Eaton Vance (EV). Calvert ran one of the first U.S. socially responsible mutual funds and has been applying ESG factors to company research for decades. “What’s essential for investors, the planet, and communities is that sustainability work be done in a way that works within our capitalist system,” says Calvert CEO John Streur. In other words, peeking at our list doesn’t mean you’re eschewing capitalism. Cisco Systems tops the list, followed by Salesforce.com, Best Buy, Intuit, HP Inc., Texas Instruments, Microsoft, Oshkosh, and, after Clorox, Xylem.

To Ascertain Sustainability, Calvert began by taking the 1,000 largest publicly held companies by market value, with headquarters in the U.S., as of Dec. 31. It excluded real estate investment trusts and master limited partnerships because their sustainability data remain uneven. Then, Calvert looked at 300 performance indicators for each company from data providers including Institutional Shareholder Services, Sustainalytics, and Thomson Reuters Asset4 in five categories: shareholders, employees, customers, planet, and community. The shareholders category included items like accounting policies and board structure; employees, workplace diversity and labor relations; customers, business ethics and product safety; planet, greenhouse-gas emissions; and community, human rights along the supply chain.

Then came the secret sauce: For every category, Calvert’s analysts ranked the companies from zero to 100. (Many sustainable investors exclude weapons manufacturers or gun makers; Calvert included such companies, but they generally have low rankings.) Then, the analysts adjusted the weighting of each category for how material it was for each industry. For example, the planet category is more material for chip makers, which use a lot of water in manufacturing, than it is for banks. Each company then got a weighted average score.

Read the complete article and see the chart of the 100 most sustainable companies with stock symbols here – https://www.barrons.com/articles/barrons-100-most-sustainable-companies-1517605530

 

Article by Leslie P. Norton, Barron’s

Additional Articles, Impact Investing, Sustainable Business

NIA Impact Capital Launches RIA for Impact Investing Investment Solutions

NIA Impact Capital Launches RIA To Provide Wealth Advisors with Impact Investing and Women-Focused Investment Solutions

 

Nia Impact Capital (www.niaimpactcapital.com) announced in February 2018 the launch of its women-led Registered Investment Advisor (RIA) dedicated to helping wealth management professionals meet the growing demand for impact investing solutions.

Founded by impact investor Kristin Hull, Nia Impact Capital provides wealth advisors, financial planners, family offices, private and family foundations, and endowments across the U.S. with unique public equities strategies.

The firm’s flagship portfolio, Nia Global Solutions Equity Portfolio, seeks to deliver a competitive rate of return, while creating positive impact for investors. In 2017, the portfolio delivered a 37.59% return, outperforming the S&P 500 by 15.77%.

“Nia Impact Capital is the next step in our evolution and is inspired by our mission to create world-class impact investing solutions with an emphasis on women,” said CEO and Chief Investment Officer Kristin Hull. “Our team is focused on supporting wealth professionals to meet the growing interest from their clients to align their wealth and their values.”

Hull has more than ten years of experience in impact investing and more than three decades of investment industry experience. In 2010, she founded Nia Community Investments, a 100% impact fund focused on social justice and environmental sustainability. Prior to that, Hull served as president and board chair of a family foundation, moving the endowment to be 100% mission aligned from 2007 to 2011.

“Our firm derives its name from the Swahili word “Nia”, which means “intention” and “purpose,” Hull said. “Purpose and intention inform why and how we invest. This means investing in companies making a real difference, whose very business model is to earn a profit by benefiting people and the planet. We strongly value both inclusion and diversity. Given the demonstrable financial performance associated with diverse teams, we invest in those companies with diverse leadership.”

Nia Global Solutions Equity Portfolio is designed to complement an advisor’s existing equity strategy. It consists of 45 to 50 publicly traded stocks, and allocates capital to companies with diversity in its leadership. Typically, 65% or more of the portfolio is invested in small- and mid-cap stocks. The portfolio meets the firm’s rigorous impact investing criteria, which includes a strong gender lens focus.

 

About Nia Impact Capital  Based in Oakland, California, Nia Impact Capital is a women-led firm providing investment solutions to wealth management professionals across the U.S. Nia Impact Capital is the firm’s Registered Investment Advisor (RIA), which manages portfolios of public equities, as well as private investments.

Additional Articles, Impact Investing, Sustainable Business

Signup to receive GreenMoney's monthly eJournal

Privacy Policy
Copyright © GreenMoney Journal 2025

Website design & development by BrandNature

Global Events Calendar

View All Events

april

21aprAll Day232026 Sustainable Packaging Coalition: SPC Impact – Nashville

27aprAll Day30Women Deliver 2026 Conference (WD2026) – Melbourne

X