{"id":16926,"date":"2017-11-22T13:26:24","date_gmt":"2017-11-22T18:26:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/test.greenmoney.com\/2025\/?p=16926"},"modified":"2018-03-07T22:48:50","modified_gmt":"2018-03-08T03:48:50","slug":"greenpeace-usa-releases-2017-guide-to-sustainable-electronics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/test.greenmoney.com\/2025\/greenpeace-usa-releases-2017-guide-to-sustainable-electronics\/","title":{"rendered":"Greenpeace USA Releases 2017 Guide to Sustainable Electronics"},"content":{"rendered":"
>> Back to December 2017 Issue<\/a><\/div>\n

Samsung Trails Behind Apple in New Greenpeace Guide to Greener Electronics. Average Grade Across 17 Companies Is D+, Indicating Long Way to Go Toward Sustainable IT.<\/em><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

The 2017 Guide to Greener Electronics<\/strong> (the Guide) was released in mid-October by Greenpeace USA, with rankings of seventeen of the world\u2019s leading consumer electronics companies on sustainable manufacturing and design of IT products. Find it here: www.greenpeace.org\/greenerguide<\/a><\/p>\n

Companies were evaluated based on their transparency, commitment, performance and advocacy efforts in three critical areas: reduction of greenhouse gases through renewable energy; use of recycled materials; and elimination of hazardous chemicals.<\/p>\n

“Tech companies claim to be at the forefront of innovation, but their supply chains are stuck in the Industrial Age. We know they can change. Rather than fueling climate change, IT companies need to show the way forward, just like Google and Apple have done with data centers run on renewables,”<\/em> said Gary Cook, Senior IT Campaigner at Greenpeace USA.<\/p>\n

The average grade across the 17 companies evaluated in the Guide was a D+, demonstrating that the sector as a whole has work to do to resolve supply chain impacts and improve product design. Fairphone, based in the Netherlands, scored best overall with a B, followed by Apple with a B-. Dell and HP follow Apple and Fairphone with a C+, while eleven companies, including Samsung, Huawei and Amazon, fall in the D and F range.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Despite its central position as both the largest manufacturer of smartphones and one of the largest suppliers of displays, Samsung\u2019s manufacturing system relies heavily on fossil fuels. The company used more than 16,000 GWh of energy in 2016, with just 1% coming from renewables, for example.<\/p>\n

Demand for consumer electronics continues to climb, with nearly 2 billion devices sold in 2016 alone. This drives demand for both finite mined materials and dirty energy. Meanwhile, e-waste is growing, due in part to the short lifespans of devices. The UN has estimated that e-waste globally will surpass 65 million tons in 2017–enough to bury San Francisco to 14 feet.<\/p>\n

Key findings of the 2017 Guide to Greener Electronics include:<\/h2>\n

\u2022 Supply chain driving demand for dirty energy: <\/strong>Up to 80% of the carbon footprint of electronic devices occurs during manufacturing. While Google, Apple and other internet companies are making progress transitioning their data centers to renewable energy, nearly all of the companies in the Guide have yet to address the rapidly growing carbon footprint and dependence on dirty energy in their supply chains. Apple is the only company thus far that has committed to 100% renewable power for its supply chain.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n